Category: 403(b)


Best Interest and Best Practices #9

Posted on November 13, 2018, by Fred Reish in 401(k), 403(b), best interest, DOL Activity, prudent, Reg BI, Registered Investment Advisers, RIA, SEC. Comments Off on Best Interest and Best Practices #9

What Does “Best Interest” Mean?

This is the 9th of a new series of articles titled “The Bests.” The series focuses on Best Interest and Best Practices. Those topics give me flexibility to discuss a range of subjects that affect both service providers, including advisors, and plan sponsors, including 401(k) and 403(b) committees.

“Best Interest” has because part of the American lexicon . . . as an aspirational goal or a demanding standard—depending on the point of view. But, what does best interest mean? It may mean different things to different people . . . and perhaps even to different regulators. However, I believe that most people would agree on the definition in this article.

As I read the guidance issued by the Department of Labor (DOL), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and New York State, there are actually two … Read More »

Share

Best Interest and Best Practices #8

Posted on November 7, 2018, by Fred Reish in 401(k), 403(b), DOL Activity, fiduciary. Comments Off on Best Interest and Best Practices #8

Fiduciary Training: The Need for Basics

This is the 8TH of a new series of articles titled “The Bests.” The series focuses on Best Interest and Best Practices. Those topics give me flexibility to discuss a range of subjects that affect both service providers, including advisors, and plan sponsors, including 401(k) and 403(b) committees.

In three earlier posts—Bests #4, #5, and #6—about the Sacerdote v. New York University decision, I discussed the good and the bad of the NYU plan committee and made several suggestions about best practices for improving committee performance. This article focuses on one of those suggestions—fiduciary education for committee members.

As a starting point, there is not a legal requirement that committee members receive fiduciary training. Instead, it’s a best practice and good risk management.

But, what should the fiduciary education cover? Based on my analysis of court … Read More »

Share

Best Interest and Best Practices #7

Posted on October 30, 2018, by Fred Reish in 401(k), 403(b), DOL Activity, Reg BI, Registered Investment Advisers, RIA, SEC. Comments Off on Best Interest and Best Practices #7

SEC Best Interests . . . When? And What About the DOL

This is the 7th of a new series of articles titled “The Bests.” The series focuses on Best Interest and Best Practices. Those topics give me flexibility to discuss a range of subjects that affect both service providers, including advisors, and plan sponsors, including 401(k) and 403(b) committees.

The Regulatory Agendas for the SEC and DOL were recently issued. Both have plans for guidance by September of 2019, but the anticipated timing of the guidance has, by and large, been misinterpreted. To understand what I mean, read on.

The SEC’s Agenda said that Final Action on the Regulation Best Interest proposal for broker-dealers and the Interpretation of Standard of Conduct for investment advisers would be “09/00/2019.”

Similarly, the Department of Labor Agenda said that there would be a final rule on … Read More »

Share

Best Interest and Best Practices #5

Posted on October 11, 2018, by Fred Reish in 401(k), 403(b), best interest, Plan Sponsors, prudent, Service Providers. Comments Off on Best Interest and Best Practices #5

What is the Baseline for A Committee to Act in the Best Interest of Its Participants? (Part 2)

This is the fifth of a series of articles titled “The Bests.” The series focuses on Best Interest and Best Practices. Those topics give me flexibility to discuss a range of subjects that affect both service providers, including advisers, and plan sponsors, including 401(k) and 403(b) committees.

This is my second article about the case of Sacerdote v. New York University. As I discussed in my last post, the Court’s opinion pointed out the deficiencies in the understandings and conduct of some committee members. However, the Court ultimately ruled in favor of the plan fiduciaries and against the plaintiffs. Why was that?

Despite the deficiencies (or “bad practices”) of some committee members, others on the committee were engaged and knowledgeable. Obviously, that was an important factor. … Read More »

Share

Best Interest and Best Practices #4

Posted on October 3, 2018, by Fred Reish in 401(k), 403(b), fiduciary. Comments Off on Best Interest and Best Practices #4

What is the Baseline for A Committee to Act in the Best Interest of Its Participants? (Part 1)

This is the fourth of a new series of articles titled “The Bests.” The series focuses on Best Interest and Best Practices. Those topics give me flexibility to discuss a range of subjects that affect both service providers, including advisors, and plan sponsors, including 401(k) and 403(b) committees.

The recent decision in the case of Sacerdote v. New York University is a classic story of the good and bad of plan committees. Let’s start with the bad.

Five current and former committee members testified at the trial. But not all of the testimony was helpful.

In the opinion, the Court said that the testimony of one of the co-chairs “was concerning.” The court went on to say:

She made it clear that she viewed her … Read More »

Share

Best Interest and Best Practices #3

Posted on September 26, 2018, by Fred Reish in 401(k), 403(b), best interest, Plan Sponsors, Service Providers. Comments Off on Best Interest and Best Practices #3

Best Practices for Plan Sponsors: Projection of Retirement Income

This is the third of a new series of articles titled “The Bests.” This series focuses on Best Interest and Best Practices. Those topics give me flexibility to discuss a range of subjects that affect both service providers, including advisors, and plan sponsors, including 401(k) committees.

My first two posts of “The Bests” were about Best Interest for advisors. In this article, I am shifting to Best Practices for plan sponsors. Keep in mind that a Best Practice is above and beyond the legal requirements. Best Practices are not mandated; they are elected.

While the most obvious Best Practices are automatic enrollment and automatic deferral increases, I want to start with the projection of retirement income for participants. That’s partially because it is in a current legislative proposal—in the Retirement Enhancement and Savings … Read More »

Share

Fiduciary Investment Advice for Participants

Posted on March 19, 2012, by Fred Reish in 403(b), DOL Activity, fiduciary, prohibited transaction, prudent. Comments Off on Fiduciary Investment Advice for Participants

The DOL recently issued its final regulation on conflicted investment advice to participants. Unfortunately, the scope of the regulation is not well understood. For example, if an adviser does not have any conflicts (that is, if the adviser cannot vary its revenue or that of any affiliates based on the recommended investments), then the adviser does not need to comply with the new regulation. For example, the adviser would not need to comply with the certification or audit requirements. However, if the adviser has financial conflicts of interest and can affect its own revenues (or those of an affiliate), then the adviser must comply with those requirements in order to give fiduciary investment advice to participants.

Together with other attorneys from my law firm, I have written a bulletin on the subject. If you are interested in having further information, please … Read More »

Share

Finally the Final … 408(b)(2) Regulation

Posted on February 3, 2012, by Fred Reish in 403(b), 408(b)(2), DOL Activity, fiduciary, Service Providers. Comments Off on Finally the Final … 408(b)(2) Regulation

The DOL issued the final 408(b)(2) regulation on February 2, 2012.

Key points are:

The extension of the effective date to July 1, 2012;
The fact that service providers are not required to provide a summary of the disclosures, though the DOL provided a sample “guide” that is not mandatory;
The addition of a requirement to describe the arrangement between a covered service provider and the payer of indirect compensation;
Clarification that electronic transmission of the disclosures is permitted;
Relief from the disclosure requirements for “frozen” 403(b) contracts;
A new requirement that plan sponsors terminate the relationship with a service provider who fails or refuses to provide information on request;
Limited relief for disclosures for brokerage accounts and similar arrangements.

Bruce Ashton and I have drafted a more detailed Alert for our law firm, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.  That Alert is located at:

http://www.drinkerbiddle.com/resources/publications/2012/finally-the-final-408b2-regulation

 

Share



Recent Insights

Best Interest and Best Practices #9

What Does “Best Interest” Mean?

This is the 9th of a new series of articles titled “The Bests.” The series focuses on Best Interest...

Best Interest and Best Practices #8

Fiduciary Training: The Need for Basics

This is the 8TH of a new series of articles titled “The Bests.” The series focuses on Best...

Best Interest and Best Practices #7

SEC Best Interests . . . When? And What About the DOL

This is the 7th of a new series of articles titled “The Bests.”...