
Alternative Assets (18)—DOL Proposal and the Six Defined Factors: Performance Benchmark (1)
The DOL’s proposed regulation on selecting investments, including alternative assets, 2026-06178.pdf, identifies six factors that should be considered in the process of selecting any investments for participant-directed plans, such as 401(k) plans and private sector 403(b) plans. The six factors are: Performance, Fees, Liquidity, Valuation, Performance Benchmark, and Complexity. The proposal describes each of those factors and provides 20 examples of their application. In earlier posts, I covered three of the factors—Performance, Fees and Complexity, and their examples I now turn to the Performance Benchmark factor. Here is the DOL’s description of that factor: (k) Performance benchmark. The plan fiduciary must appropriately consider and determine that each designated investment alternative has a meaningful benchmark, and compare the risk-adjusted expected returns of the designated investment alternative to the meaningful benchmark. There may be more than one meaningful benchmark for a designated investment alternative, however no single benchmark is a meaningful benchmark for all designated investment alternatives on a plan investment menu. A ‘‘meaningful benchmark’’ is an investment, strategy, index, or other comparator that has similar mandates, strategies, objectives, and risks to the designated investment alternative. The ‘‘risk-adjusted expected returns’’ of the designated investment alternative may be determined based on its historical


